From: Mark R. <ma...@la...> - 2020-05-18 15:51:51
|
On 18-05-2020 01:39, Paul Vinkenoog wrote: > Hi Mark, > >>> - Font size is rather biggish. Maybe 10% smaller or so would be better and >>> more in line with the average informative website? >> >> I tweaked the font size a bit: >> https://www.lawinegevaar.nl/fbdocs/html/en/experiment/fblangref25/fblangref25.html > > The font size is exactly the same as before (I kept the screen snapshots from last week). > I'm just talking about the main text and the nav pane here, didn't check the others. I didn't change the font size of the navigation pane, but there is a difference in the size of the main body text (1em instead of 1.0625em), compare with https://www.lawinegevaar.nl/fbdocs/html/en/experiment/fblangref25/fblangref25-oldsize.html, or see this image: https://www.dropbox.com/s/3ra80co6ol05e18/compare-sizes.png?dl=0 Be aware, the sources of the 'oldsize' document are not identical to the previous one as I had to recreate the asciidoc sources. There are rendering differences. For example the introduction of the first section still uses a monospace font because I didn't fix that issue, and I have removed more blockquotes than in the previous version, because I started in the wrong place to fix the cause of a rendering error, and some of the other fixes and changes I applied while experimenting are not in this version. Mark -- Mark Rotteveel |