From: Dmitry Y. <fir...@ya...> - 2020-05-10 15:23:38
|
10.05.2020 14:19, Mark Rotteveel wrote: > I have published an PDF and HTML version of the Firebird 2.5 Language > Reference built from asciidoc. I have used some elements of style from > the old documentation, but a lot of it is based on the standard asciidoc > styles. > > Could you look at the overall style of things to see if there are things > you really don't like. > > https://www.lawinegevaar.nl/fbdocs/html/en/experiment/fblangref25.html Basically close to excellence, in my opinion ;-) Font size is OK to me, styles are good. Some comments: 1) 3.1. Integer Data Types, 3.2. Floating-Point Data Types, 3.3. Fixed-Point Data Types -- why titles use a monospace font? This is OK for "3.2.1. FLOAT", for example, but not for the regular text. "3.1.4. Hexadecimal Format for Integer Numbers" is OK though. I see that this is actually a problem with the source (<database> tag is wrongly used there), but the old rendering seems not paying attention to that. 2) The code examples inside <blockquote><programlisting> are not only italic but also use a bigger font than inside just <programlisting>. Non-code <blockquote>s are also bigger than the text around them. Should the <blockquote> really change the underlying font size? This doesn't disturb much in HTML, but it's more annoying in PDF. I think a box with yellow background is enough to separate quotes from the other text, bigger font is an overkill here. 3) Looking at <link linkend="fblangref25-sidebar01">Switching the Terminator in <emphasis>isql</emphasis></link> on page 159 inside the DDL chapter, I see that PDF is rendered with two links "Switching the Terminator in" and "isql". Looks weird. 4) I don't like how titles of <note> / <important> blocks are rendered, they're just italic of the default size. I'd prefer a bigger font (and maybe a different colour) as it was in the old version. 5) Table columns need to be properly sized. 50/50 doesn't look good, especially for argument-description type of tables. Right-size alignment in some columns also looks weird. Dmitry |