Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Problem creating the code with EF6 Code First from Database

[Daniel R. <da...@ac...>]

Hi,

At April 22, 2017, 10:09 AM, Jiří Činčura wrote:

>> I was starting to suspect that, since the other tables that I was able
>> to generate the code for didn't have computed fields. Are there any
>> hints that I can use?
>> 
>> I can try to look at the code to see if I can fix the problem. And,
>> since I never did look inside the ADO.Net driver code. Can you guide
>> me to what would be the area of code that I would need to look at?
>> 
>> I'm willing to try to fix the problem, since this is not the only
>> table in that database that has computed fields.

> You can create a table without computed field, generate the CF for it.
> And then do the same for a table with computed field.

But,  what  could  cause  it  not  to recognize those fields properly?
Because   when   I   look   in   the  database's  system  tables,  the
RDB$FIELD_TYPE  and  RDB$FIELD_LENGTH  both  have  values in them, one
would be VARCHAR(132) and the others would be CHAR(1).

-- 
Best regards,
 Daniel Rail
 Senior Software Developer
 ACCRA Solutions Inc. (www.accra.ca)
 ACCRA Med Software Inc. (www.filopto.com)