From: Ivan A. <int...@un...> - 2016-12-16 14:49:08
|
Why would the engine throw such an event in the first place? Does it have an actual reason or is it a bug to be fixed? I don't think the provider should just ignore server messages sent on purpose, but there might be an actual option on whether the current user actually needs them or not. 2016-12-16 16:18 GMT+02:00 Alexander Muylaert-Gelein < amu...@ho...>: > I say ney. It doesn’t make sense to raise unraised events. > > > > Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for > Windows 10 > > > > *From: *Jiří Činčura <ji...@ci...> > *Sent: *vrijdag 16 december 2016 17:15 > *To: *For users & developers of the Firebird .NET providers > <fir...@li...> > *Subject: *[Firebird-net-provider] Firing event when event count is 0 > > > Hi *, > > As I'm now reworking some pieces in events (together with finalizers), > I'm wondering whether it make sense to fire the event for events when > the event count was 0. From outside POV it doesn't make much sense. > > What do you think? > > -- > Mgr. Jiří Činčura > Independent IT Specialist > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > ------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > Firebird-net-provider mailing list > Fir...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-net-provider > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > ------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > Firebird-net-provider mailing list > Fir...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-net-provider > > |