Re: [Firebird-docs] SQL2003 Update

[Paul V. <pa...@vi...>]

Hi Lester,

> The problem of cause is that what the list hides at present is where
> a word is actually used differently between the various columns. The
> SQL ones are on the whole consistent, but do not necessarily match
> the Firebird, MySQL or PostgeSQL use :)

> That is why I'm trying to populate the secondary pages and identify
> the uses. The simple glossary is not going to be useful unless the
> context of a words use is established.

If the use of a word is *somewhat* different, I don't think it's a
problem. A glossary is just to get an idea of what a word means "by
and large".

But if it's used for two completely different actions, yes, then it
needs explanation. Either within a single definiton, or by linking to
different definitions.


Greetings,
Paul Vinkenoog