From: Dmitry Y. <fir...@ya...> - 2014-06-28 08:29:30
|
28.06.2014 11:54, Mark Rotteveel wrote: > As far as I understood, the cursor stability fix was about changes made > by the statement to its own data (eg an UPDATE or DELETE). The fix was about changes made by statements located underneath the cursor (e.g. for select + insert/update/delete inside, with regular searched updates/deletes and select-based inserts belonging to the same category). > The text I quoted defines significant changes as "if and only if it > is independent of CR, and, had it been committed before CR was opened, > would have caused the sequence of rows in the result set descriptor of > CR to be different in any respect" Here "independent" means everything but positioned update/delete, so it includes both "stacked" cases we fixed and "sequential" cases. Dmitry |