From: Claudio V. C. <cv...@us...> - 2014-04-29 14:10:54
|
> -----Original Message----- > From: Dmitry Yemanov [mailto:fir...@ya...] > Sent: Martes, 29 de Abril de 2014 3:44 > > 29.04.2014 01:21, Claudio Valderrama C. wrote: > > > I know people will feel outraged with my opinion, but > anyway: make DDL > > operations atomic and immediate. > > Atomic and immediate means autocommitted or always executed in a > separate (e.g. system) transaction? For me, autocommitted. > > Uncommitted DDL and DML working in unison > > with stable DB structure is a naive dream, period. > > Maybe true for the current FB code, but not generally. Other > databases > can handle this reliably. But they have a limited degree of data versioning, if any. I would like to see a SqlServer DB with versioning activated and pending DDL changes (never tried). C. |