Re: [Firebird-devel] Planning the post v3 development

[Carlos H. C. <li...@wa...>]

DY> 28.04.2014 23:05, Carlos H. Cantu wrote:

>> I think most of them needs basic asynchronous replication, covering
>> single and multi-master scenarios. For those who needs more complex
>> scenarios, there are third party comercial tools. Anyway, I'm not the
>> right person to answer, since I didn't need replication in my projects
>> so far, so I'll leave this for Jesus or any others to answer. If you
>> are interested, I can run a poll at firebirdnews.org and firebase
>> about what users would expect in "native" FB replication.

DY> I believe that polls tend to show what users want, often mismatching 
DY> with what they need ;-) But I have no objections to the poll, if 
DY> questions are composed carefully.

Give me the question(s) (or answers, if it would be a single choice
question) and I'll put it online.

>> I asked Alexey and seems that most of the previous problems are
>> fixed, but dropping tables with active connections still causes
>> corruption. Maybe he can give more details.

DY> Table used by active connections cannot be dropped. But maybe there are
DY> some race conditions yet unknown for us.

Please ask him for more details about this.

[]s
Carlos
http://www.firebirdnews.org
FireBase - http://www.FireBase.com.br