From: Dmitry Y. <fir...@ya...> - 2014-04-29 08:24:08
|
29.04.2014 12:09, Mark Rotteveel wrote: > If you look at SQL Server, there jobs themselves are not defined for a > specific database (although they may depend on one or more databases). > AFAIK they are stored in the master database. Execution requires an Agent > service to be running. We neither have a master database, nor an agent service, nor database links to access user dbs from a master one (or any other solution to this issue). Shouldn't we think about something more realistic? Or at least postpone scheduled tasks until we have a proper foundation built? Dmitry |