From: Zvjezdan T. <ze...@gm...> - 2013-11-12 21:28:31
|
go ahead. do it properly. On Nov 12, 2013 4:08 PM, "Jiri Cincura" <di...@ci...> wrote: > Hi *, > > I found a bug in connection pool. I *don't* know the root cause. But > anyway I think the code there isn't "good" or "nice", so to speak. But > I currently have an application in front of me, that escalates the > problem, some memory leaks. I think I might go to rewrite the pooling > (I implemented one earlier this year for another provider) and test > it. Hopefully it will be simpler, faster and correct. BUT it might > (will) not have exactly same API/behavior as the old one (and I don't > wanna to try mimic it). So it will be huge breaking change if you rely > on something like that. Of course the major version number will be > incremented. And I hope I'll not introduce more bugs. ;) > > Is there anybody against it? > > -- > Jiri {x2} Cincura (x2develop.com founder) > http://blog.cincura.net/ | http://www.ID3renamer.com > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > November Webinars for C, C++, Fortran Developers > Accelerate application performance with scalable programming models. > Explore > techniques for threading, error checking, porting, and tuning. Get the most > from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and > register > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60136231&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > _______________________________________________ > Firebird-net-provider mailing list > Fir...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-net-provider > |