From: Leyne, S. <Se...@br...> - 2012-01-03 20:10:01
|
Thomas, > While the restore process is pretty much I/O bound, While that is true for desktop PCs with HDDs (not SSDs) or server without a cached RAID controllers, but it is certainly not true as a blanket statement. There is plenty of room for more throughput. > Another option might be to restore to a RAM disk, if the database file fits > onto it and then move the restored database to a persistent storage. Agreed, and a restore process with multiple writers and multiple index rebuilds would be of even more significant benefit! A RAM disk based backup/restore is possible today without any change to FB. I am referring to a truly kick-but restore process. Sean |