From: Dimitry S. <sd...@ib...> - 2012-01-02 16:54:25
|
02.01.2012 17:40, Lester Caine wrote: > In my own cases, ANY downtime during office hours is unacceptable, so any > failure that brings the whole system down would result in penalties! Organised > downtime is possible on many sites, but some sites are running 24/7, So we > maintain data in a manor that the system will work with elements down, but the > database operation must be maintained. Firebird has been running reliably for > many years on these sites, when other services HAVE crashed, to the extent that > services have been moving onto our framework due simply to it's reliability:) > > Customers care very much about downtime ... especially if it HAS to happen > simply for maintenance reasons. But maintenance doesn't inevitable cause downtime. Maintenance of one piece of a system can't stop whole system if other pieces will do all the job. This is the main idea behind RAID1-6, for example. What's wrong with your system if it cannot work without only one part of it?.. -- SY, SD. PS: For me it is rather strange to talk about so basic principles of reliability here... |