Re: [Firebird-devel] Firebird Transaction ID limit solution

[Dimitry S. <sd...@ib...>]

01.01.2012 23:43, Kjell Rilbe wrote:
> Den 2012-01-01 23:25 skrev Dimitry Sibiryakov såhär:
>> 01.01.2012 21:31, Kjell Rilbe wrote:
>>> So far, these are the suggestions I've seen
>>      Hey, how about my suggestion leave everything as is and perform backup-restore cycle on
>> demand?..
>>
>> Pros:
>> - No overhead.
>> - No additional disk space.
>> - No code change.
>> Cons:
>> - DBA with brain is required.
> Yes, of course! But you're forgetting this:
> Con:
> - If the no downtime is acceptable, it requires special measures to be
> able to keep the system running during a backup-restore cycle, e.g. cluster.

   Single server without downtime is a myth anyway.
   And 24/365 systems cannot live without DBA in any case.

-- 
   SY, SD.