From: Lester C. <le...@ls...> - 2012-01-01 22:48:09
|
Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote: > 01.01.2012 21:31, Kjell Rilbe wrote: >> > So far, these are the suggestions I've seen > Hey, how about my suggestion leave everything as is and perform backup-restore cycle on > demand?.. > > Pros: > - No overhead. > - No additional disk space. > - No code change. > Cons: > - DBA with brain is required. ... Requires a downtime? Which can be substantial Unless the configuration can be set up to allow updates applied following the backup-restore cycle to be reapplied? -- Lester Caine - G8HFL ----------------------------- Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk// Firebird - http://www.firebirdsql.org/index.php |