From: Kjell R. <kje...@da...> - 2012-01-01 10:34:08
|
Den 2011-12-31 15:08 skrev Dmitry Yemanov såhär: > 31.12.2011 17:57, Alexander Peshkov wrote: > >> This will make each version of the record (not the record- but EACH >> version of it) 4 bytes longer. > Not strictly necessary. We could use a variable-length encoding for txn > ids longer than 32 bits and mark such records with a new flag. It would > add zero storage/performance overhead for all the current applications > but allow longer txn ids for the slightly bigger cost. It would increase > the code complexity though. Are there unused flag bits available in the current record format, that could be used for this purpose? Or how are such flag bits encoded? Kjell -- -------------------------------------- Kjell Rilbe DataDIA AB E-post: kj...@da... Telefon: 08-761 06 55 Mobil: 0733-44 24 64 |