From: Leyne, S. <Se...@br...> - 2011-12-27 21:17:07
|
Dimitry, > 27.12.2011 19:17, Leyne, Sean wrote: > > That type of solution is not what I would define as a cluster. > > As you wish. But the rest of world consider this kind of system to be called > "a shared-nothing cluster". You are correct! "a shared-nothing cluster" is a type of cluster, one that is used for a number of database cluster solutions. I should have said: "That type of solution is not what immediately comes to mind for me, since I see a shared disk solution (using redundant SAN storage) to be much easier to implement for FB." Sean |