From: Lester C. <le...@ls...> - 2011-06-05 18:07:53
|
marius adrian popa wrote: > On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 12:03 PM, ak...@ib...<ak...@ib...> wrote: >> Hello Lester, >> >> This design was available for review since December. Where were you during >> last months with design suggestions? >> >> We will run it as is asap, all improvements will be done after launch (and >> after thorough discussion, be prepared to protect your thoughts with >> prooflinks and serious arguments). > > Lester send patches and css fixes and we will consider I don't do css ... the CMS system should take care of that in a consistent manor, but currently the new website is far from consistent ... so is it using a properly themed model at all? > Also if you find bugs and missings please report them to the tracker > For the wiki part seems that is good to have one , if the dqteam want > we can put the wiki on > main servers or on the old one > I see that jaybird is using docuwiki I think we can use docuwiki for > all other subprojects that want them > http://jaybirdwiki.firebirdsql.org/jaybird/doku.php?id=info:start > tutorials can be easily written without knowing the docbook syntax THAT is the sort of thing that is pigging annoying. When are we going to start using FIREBIRD to support our own processes? Which database IS the jaybirdwiki running on - and if it is Firebird, why hasn't the code been pushed back TO docuwiki. It's bad enough having to cope with Python and the like just to gain access to DVCS for some of the projects I am trying to keep Firebird availability in without adding other competitors products 'because our own tools are no good'. -- Lester Caine - G8HFL ----------------------------- Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk// Firebird - http://www.firebirdsql.org/index.php |