Re: [Firebird-devel] Providers, yvalve, external engines and object lifecycle

[Dimitry S. <sd...@ib...>]

25.03.2011 18:07, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
> Also, let say external code receives an engine IAttachment which was
> registered in yvalve and now has a handle. Then external code starts to
> use this handle and start new transaction with legacy API.

   Why the code would like to do such stupid things?.. It can start new transaction using 
received IAttachment. And to accomplish that it doesn't need it's handle.

> This is pure internal command, has nothing to do with API, so it may
> execute without yvalve like any other internal command. If it's an
> external datasource, it must be created by yvalve cause it may go to
> another provider.

   It has sense if the external datasource establish new connection. But for working with 
current connection to route calls through yvalve is just a lost of time.

-- 
   SY, SD.