From: Alex P. <pes...@ma...> - 2011-01-27 10:54:27
|
On 01/27/11 13:40, Dmitry Yemanov wrote: > 27.01.2011 13:28, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote: > >> Exactly to make threads' creation/deletion seldom. Sleeping thread consumes no resources. > Doesn't 2MB of stack count, especially when you have hundreds of them? Certainly it's virtual space, but anyway - taking into an account that CPUs became a bit faster since IB6, it's reasonable to think about making timeout smaller. |