From: Dimitry S. <sd...@ib...> - 2011-01-27 10:45:24
|
27.01.2011 11:38, Vlad Khorsun wrote: >>> What the reason to change it ? Note, larger value could lead to longer consume >>> of unneeded resources. Lower value could lead to often thread's creation\deletion. >> >> Exactly to make threads' creation/deletion seldom. Sleeping thread consumes no resources. > > Really ? Even no virtual memory for stack, for example ? Yep. Other threads have own stack and can't profit from extra megabyte. >> I would think about timeout about 10 minutes... > > Why 10 and not 15 or 33 or 42 (c) ? Because of the blue sky. I agree that 15 is better than 10. May be 42 can be better than 15, I don't know. -- SY, SD. |