From: Vlad K. <hv...@us...> - 2011-01-27 10:38:43
|
>> What the reason to change it ? Note, larger value could lead to longer consume >> of unneeded resources. Lower value could lead to often thread's creation\deletion. > > Exactly to make threads' creation/deletion seldom. Sleeping thread consumes no resources. Really ? Even no virtual memory for stack, for example ? > I would think about timeout about 10 minutes... Why 10 and not 15 or 33 or 42 (c) ? Regards, Vlad |