From: Adriano d. S. F. <adr...@gm...> - 2010-01-05 16:31:49
|
Dmitry Yemanov wrote: > Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote: > >>> If that exception is thrown in the new way [exception e1 ('foo', 'bar')] >> And this is ambiguous syntax, with [exception e1<expr>] syntax when >> only one parameter is used. > > Why ambiguous, provided that parenthesis would be mandatory? > Because I can already do: exception ex ('replacement text'); That means different thing than: exception ex ('single parameter'); Adriano |