Re: [Firebird-website] A few thoughts about (new) site structure,

[Carlos H. C. <li...@wa...>]

DY> In our case we'll need to have a layout skeleton done by the designer
DY> beforehand. My demo (while being css based) was not intended for the 
DY> real world testing.

And I not saying the contrary. My point is that it is always better
choose/test a layout if it shows real info, and it is much easier to
produce them if the content is coming from database, unless someone
likes to exercise copy/paste skills ;) The static x dynamic content
subject was being discussed a few days ago, and IMHO, this is +1 for
dynamic (so my comment).

This is not the first time that layouts, structures, logos, etc. are
being discussed, and all the previous attempts ended in nothing being
done because there was too many suggestions, ideas, etc. but no
agreement, and I'm seeing this happening again. So, I'm leaving this
entire discussion, because as I already said, my opinion is that 2 or
3 (max) capable persons/professionals should handle this task without
having to explain or ask approval for each proposed change.

[]s
Carlos H. Cantu
www.FireBase.com.br - www.firebirdnews.org
www.warmboot.com.br - blog.firebase.com.br