From: tjelvar e. <tj...@fa...> - 2009-11-18 15:03:47
|
Hi Lester, > If nobody can be bothered to use what we have had for some > considerable time ... > We have been asking for input - which includes theming - for two > years. > This was the first fully functional CMS system using Firebird out of > the box ... I'm not sure I understand You, I'm new in this game and don't know anyting about the cms you're mentioning. What's the name of it? > Have you actually looked at what COULD be done if someone took a > little time to > play? Is it live somewhere in some condition? I do see benefits, regarding development and maintainence, of using a widely spread cms, but as said before, I belive that's a later discussion. > those of us who do use it are more interested in keeping > the relevant notes in one place than esthetics ;) Oh, sorry again, I just don't agree... ;-) Let's work for something that's inviting, clean and comprehensive. And that lasts over time. Peace and love, //t 18 nov 2009 kl. 14.30 skrev Lester Caine: > tjelvar eriksson wrote: >> I'm afraid I have to disagree, "up and running" is relative... >> >> One of the most important features is a well laid out documentation, >> searchable and with easy navigation, or am I wrong? >> >> My apoligies if I sound harsh, all the credits to all the hard work >> done by everyone, but I really belive fb needs more than a mockup. >> >> All the best > > If nobody can be bothered to use what we have had for some > considerable time ... > We have been asking for input - which includes theming - for two > years. > This was the first fully functional CMS system using Firebird out of > the box ... > how many more are currently available of the shelf. The only reason > it 'looks > like a mockup' is that those of us who do use it are more interested > in keeping > the relevant notes in one place than esthetics ;) > > Have you actually looked at what COULD be done if someone took a > little time to > play? > >> //tjelvar >> >> 18 nov 2009 kl. 13.45 skrev Lester Caine: >> >>> marius adrian popa wrote: >>>> Later we can >>>> Choose an cms that supports firebird : drupal or later next year >>>> wordpress (after is ported) >>>> or site must be codded in something modern like django/cakphp >>> So you are not prepared simply to add a new theme to the existing >>> working wiki? >>> It's all up and running, but does not get as much use as it >>> should :( > > > -- > Lester Caine - G8HFL > ----------------------------- > Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact > L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk > EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ > Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk// > Firebird - http://www.firebirdsql.org/index.php > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 > 30-Day > trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and > focus on > what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with > Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july > _______________________________________________ > Firebird-website mailing list > Fir...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-website |