From: Lester C. <le...@ls...> - 2009-11-18 13:53:57
|
tjelvar eriksson wrote: > I'm afraid I have to disagree, "up and running" is relative... > > One of the most important features is a well laid out documentation, > searchable and with easy navigation, or am I wrong? > > My apoligies if I sound harsh, all the credits to all the hard work > done by everyone, but I really belive fb needs more than a mockup. > > All the best If nobody can be bothered to use what we have had for some considerable time ... We have been asking for input - which includes theming - for two years. This was the first fully functional CMS system using Firebird out of the box ... how many more are currently available of the shelf. The only reason it 'looks like a mockup' is that those of us who do use it are more interested in keeping the relevant notes in one place than esthetics ;) Have you actually looked at what COULD be done if someone took a little time to play? > //tjelvar > > 18 nov 2009 kl. 13.45 skrev Lester Caine: > >> marius adrian popa wrote: >>> Later we can >>> Choose an cms that supports firebird : drupal or later next year >>> wordpress (after is ported) >>> or site must be codded in something modern like django/cakphp >> So you are not prepared simply to add a new theme to the existing >> working wiki? >> It's all up and running, but does not get as much use as it should :( -- Lester Caine - G8HFL ----------------------------- Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk// Firebird - http://www.firebirdsql.org/index.php |