|
From: Alexander P. <pes...@ma...> - 2009-11-16 13:49:16
|
On Monday 16 November 2009 16:21:26 Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote: > Claudio Valderrama C. escreveu: > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Adriano dos Santos Fernandes [mailto:adr...@gm...] > >> Sent: Domingo, 15 de Noviembre de 2009 21:15 > >> > >> I now want to encode it as follow: > >> numberOfFields: USHORT > >> list of Ods::Descriptor > >> numberOfFieldsWithDefault: USHORT > >> list of (<fieldId: USHORT><Ods::Descriptor><data: > >> dsc_length bytes>) > > > > What about using ULONG instead of USHORT for whatever extension needed in > > the future? I know some SAS tests that use a very high amount of fields > > and it seems it's not pure lab testing. > > There are many changes needed to support more than 64K columns. :-) I > think have partial support for it in the ODS is not good. > > And more than 64K column is also not needed IMHO. Agreed - when we decide to have more columns, we should better cleanup all places. Currently it's better to have uniform usage of datatypes in all over firebird. |