From: Rustam G. <fir...@ma...> - 2009-10-26 18:40:32
|
Dimitry Sibiryakov > In this case the field must be at least VARCHAR[258] to be able keep > string of 128*2+2 of '"'. I don't know anybody who would like to use > name from 128 double-quotes, but Alex, perhaps, does. You just substitute things. If decided to improve some part of engine it must be improved generically - if it has no other objections. If tomorrow I'll (or you) want to create table "ofigenno_dlinnoe_nazavanie_on_russian" (or migrate such DB from Access etc) - it's better to full support such marasms. Or you see any difference between UTF varchar(64) and UTF varchar(128) ? WBR, GR |