Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Firebird scalability under heavy load

[Jiri C. <di...@ci...>]

On 1/13/08, pablosantosluac <pab...@te...> wrote:
> On the other hand, in my test, the embedded server  is slower than the "external" one: 444s to complete the embedded vs 291 the  "external". Just to give some data to compare: using SQL Server the same test  (exactly the same code base) requires 198 seconds. The interesting thing is that  the test with only one client (instead of 20) is faster with the Fb backend than  the SQL Server one. Maybe it is not an issue with the provider but firebird  itself, although the time taken to marshal and unmarshal looks like a possible  "culprit".

Well the "external" is native you can save some time spent in embedded
to pass data to/from dll library.

-- 
Jiri {x2} Cincura (Microsoft Student Partner)
http://blog.vyvojar.cz/jirka/ | http://www.ID3renamer.com