From: Geoff W. <ge...@te...> - 2004-06-08 06:12:59
|
> my host application *is* a server and runs as a service. I'd > think that anyone intending to embed (or otherwise implement) > a server open to remote connections should take all the > necessary precautions. So what this is all about really is... Rather than a two step install where you install 1. Fb-Server as a service 2. Your own application as a service You would like to do it in one step 1. Install your own app that also installs Fb-Server. Other than installation what other advantages would such a configuration offer? I am guessing that, with an appropriate API, you may be able to offer additional server management capabilities. But then again with the appropriate API these should be available even with the normal configuration. You can already integrate a FB install into your own install, although the result is still a separate service. So the install advantage does not seem to be very great. To be blunt; What is the point? -- Geoff Worboys Telesis Computing |