From: Alan M. <al...@me...> - 2004-06-08 04:39:25
|
> S> - has "auto-start" functionality > > Not necessary (not even desirable, according to Jim). An explicit start > exported function would be enough/better. > > S> - can support remote connections > > Yes. > > S> Is this correct? > > Yes. And I have the feeling that once it's available people will start > to use it and wonder why haven't they thought about it before. ;-) > > Ciao > -- > Nando Dessena If the application hosting the dll desided to quit, what would happen to 3rd party applications using the dll as it's means of serving data? The host application would just close and drop the dll wouldn't it? Alan |