From: James A. <ja...@th...> - 2004-03-11 18:54:08
|
Is there going to be some new method to replace the FIRST/SKIP in 2.0? We use that in our application and would hope to still have a way to use it. - James >This code is indeed unsupportable. Most of this code should go away when >we introduce true BOOLEAN datatype. >The rest of this code is to support FIRST/SKIP construct which was >apparently introduced without grammar analysis and looking at standard >first which defines ROWS construct for this purpose (now supported in >2.0). We may keep, but deprecate FIRST/SKIP in 2.0 to clean this quirks >out of code later. What do you think? > >What do you mean when say we may address this non-LARL(1) issue via >bison productions? > > > >Nickolay > > |