From: Thomas S. <ts...@ib...> - 2003-12-02 09:20:44
|
> I'm surprised that I - apparently - am pretty much the only one > that sees this as a problem. Is there anyone out there who thinks > that the client should NOT read firebird.conf to find it's default > port? (let alone, disable all others). > > I say: the client should use the port defined by "fb_db" in the > "services" file, use 3050 by default, or use the connect string. > That's it. That's all there is to it. I guess I have to agree here with Martijn. So, the current behaviour would mean, that we can't connect to a remote server from a server that is listening on a different port? For example. I'm sitting on the server with Firebird 1.5 running on port 3055. How can I connect from that server to a remote server listening on port 3060? It seems that specifying the port in the connect string gets ignored, when RemoteServicePort is defined. Or am I totally wrong here? Thanks for any clarification. Thomas |