From: Claudio V. C. <cv...@us...> - 2003-08-27 11:46:08
|
Dmitry Yemanov wrote: > Dimitry, > >>> This is currently seen as unfortunate by many, and Nickolay had used >>> his commit access already to hack the fix for cp1251 into current >>> builds. >> >> And I don't know any russian developer who would blame him for this >> action. > > If we'd have different collations for Russian, Ukrainian etc, > then I'd call > this change very questionable. E.g. which collation should be > considered a default one for WIN1250? Hungarian? Slovakian? I think > that's why > UPPER uses > binary collation by default. Yes, it's easy to default to a non-binary collation when a charset supports only one language. To give a western example, look at WIN1252 or ISO8859_1, what should be the non-binary default collation??? Do we select the collation based on number of speakers for the related language, alphabetic precedence, number of FB users for that collation, etc? C. |