From: <psc...@in...> - 2002-12-13 22:02:41
|
On 13 Dec 2002 at 11:14, Ivan Prenosil wrote: > > From: psc...@in... > > > The main reason for this feature is to cope with software that > > > hasn't been written in a sympathetic way towards sensible > > > transaction length, so implementing in the client seems weaker > > > than having a _database_ parameter. > > > > The software should be fixed, a maximum transaction duration, cures > > the symptom, and not the overall disease, a badly designed app, > > which probably has other problems as well. > > Don't you think that with "Max transaction duration" feature it will > be much easier to force people to fix/redesign their apps ? (Either > they will fix it, or it will not work at all.) Unless of course it's a critical month end application, and it has to be finished by a certain time, and nobody realises the reason it keeps dying is the transaction duration limiter.... |