From: Christian P. <c_p...@ya...> - 2002-12-11 18:36:45
|
Hi Ann! > I guess that would depend on the units used. If you > can set the > number of months that a transaction can be open, > that seems OK. > If the units are hours or minutes, the chance of > killing a major > report or year-end process is high enough to scare > me off. I've a customer who have 50 concurrent users and made about 100000 transaction a day over one GDB, this week I was testing a new application over the same database and today I see this in the static's: Oldest transaction 1481648 Oldest active 1481649 Oldest snapshot 1481649 Next transaction 1598010 this is not good, of course, the design of the application is horrible!!!!. :)) I'm thinking in minutes or hours, but if you don't want to use this feature you can set it to 0 so the transaction will never be closed by the server. I think that a feature like this will be a very usefull for critical systems with hight number of users and for tunning new applications. Christian |