From: Nickolay S. <sk...@bs...> - 2002-11-23 14:09:53
|
Hello, Claudio ! Saturday, November 23, 2002, 6:50:19 AM, you wrote: >> >> This inconsistency makes usage of parameters really painful experience. >> >> There are tools that rely on this incorrect behavior while generating >> dynamic SQL. It seems that popular ones like IBExpert are among of >> them. > IBO has code to overcome those bugs, too. Is this code already able to handle correct order of parameters ? I.e. is this code parameter order independent ? >> Supporting both new and older behavior is difficult and ill-formed, >> but usage of new semantics will break compatibility with some of >> existing applications. >> >> What I'm going to do is to test my fix some more and commit it to CVS >> as is. Suggestions ? > You'll break several applications. Can't you make that code conditional at > run-time? I can make add a copy of older pass1_rse and pass1_sort to the server. But this code is not very static and changes often. My experience tells me it means that non-default variant will die soon. What about introducing correct behavior in Alpha 5 and if there will be many complaints add bug-emulation layer ? I think it is really difficult to say now how many applications strongly depend on older buggy behavior. Public testing will tell exactly that. -- Best regards, Nickolay Samofatov mailto:sk...@bs... |