From: Raymond K. <pr...@ch...> - 2002-10-28 02:48:45
|
Dmitry Yemanov wrote: > > Helen, > > > I might be mistaken, but I think he was talking about a SP > > containing a > > PLAN which had a reference to an integrity index (RDB$PRIMARYnnn, > > etc.). If so, he got the wrong answer about current gbak > > behaviour, which does NOT maintain the original identifiers for > > integrity indexes when restoring. > > Sorry, but it DOES. Every RDB$PRIMARY34 or RDB$FOREIGN56 will have exactly > the same name after restore and will correspond to the same tables/fields. > Only recreating a database from script will rename these indices. > > Dmitry Wrong! I just tried it with FB1.0: gbak: ERROR: index RDB$FOREIGN66 cannot be used in the specified plan gbak: ERROR: index RDB$FOREIGN66 cannot be used in the specified plan gbak: ERROR: Exiting before completion due to errors. -- Raymond Kennington Programming Solutions W2W Team B |