From: pablosantosluac <pab...@te...> - 2007-12-28 10:06:22
|
Ok, so, you mean I should try with the new 2.0+ provider? I mean, we are = having the same problems with the "server" (not the embedded one). Our intention is to continue using Firebird as our primary target = database, so we'll really like to outperform other SCM systems using Fb = as we do using SQL Server. pablo ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Carlos=20 To: For users and developers of the Firebird .NET providers=20 Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 10:47 AM Subject: Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Firebird scalability under heavy = load Hello: We have to continue using .NET 1.1 that's why we didn't move to a = newer provider. Ok, it maybe a provider problem, in version 2.0+ there are several = changes in the embedded server support some of them to solver = performance problems ( that if i remember well they are not applied to = 1.7, some of the changes was contributued by a provider user time ago ) =20 --=20 Carlos Guzm=C3=A1n =C3=81lvarez Vigo-Spain=20 -------------------------------------------------------------------------= ----- = -------------------------------------------------------------------------= This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------= ----- _______________________________________________ Firebird-net-provider mailing list Fir...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-net-provider |