|
From: pablosantosluac <pab...@te...> - 2007-12-28 10:06:22
|
Ok, so, you mean I should try with the new 2.0+ provider? I mean, we are =
having the same problems with the "server" (not the embedded one).
Our intention is to continue using Firebird as our primary target =
database, so we'll really like to outperform other SCM systems using Fb =
as we do using SQL Server.
pablo
----- Original Message -----=20
From: Carlos=20
To: For users and developers of the Firebird .NET providers=20
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 10:47 AM
Subject: Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Firebird scalability under heavy =
load
Hello:
We have to continue using .NET 1.1 that's why we didn't move to a =
newer provider.
Ok, it maybe a provider problem, in version 2.0+ there are several =
changes in the embedded server support some of them to solver =
performance problems ( that if i remember well they are not applied to =
1.7, some of the changes was contributued by a provider user time ago )
=20
--=20
Carlos Guzm=C3=A1n =C3=81lvarez
Vigo-Spain=20
-------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-----
=
-------------------------------------------------------------------------=
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-----
_______________________________________________
Firebird-net-provider mailing list
Fir...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-net-provider
|