Re: [Firebird-test] Testing Firbird --- SI-

[Konstantin K. <klk...@ns...>]

Hi Mark!
>
> Neils change I believe has just been committed, (perhaps he or Claudio
would want to clarify it). If you can incorperate it (by just updating the
file) jrd/idx.h.  and give it a quick rerun through the TCS that would be
best.
Ok I move to Neil`s version 384.
And retest it all. I think it will be in 3-5 days.
>
> Failing that, don't worry too much about it, this is a beta and the error
as I understand it is not fatal and having it would match the current win32
and linux beta2 release. Since we have already a number of other changes
afoot: skip(x) offset value change; produce errors for ambigious field
references; etc, I'd say don't worry too much about it, as I have a
suspicion that in a weeks time we will be knocking on your door again asking
for a rebuild for beta3 or RC1 or whatever we call our next version :-),
>
Your are welcome  ...
>
> I think you got the message (Im guessing from the post) about the tag
> structure, but just in case you missed it:
>
> I was using the format:
> T1_0_0Beta2-linux-T1_0_0-0a_Beta2
>
> The format being
> <version> - <platform> - <something to match the physical distrib.
> package name>
>
> applied via:
>
> cvs -z9 tag T1_0_0Beta2-linux-T1_0_0-0a_Beta2 .
>
I will use T1_0_0Beta2-Solaris-X86-T1_0_0-<reported version by -z>
>
> Im not sure how your i386 tag should differ from Neils, sparc tag, be
> that as part of the <package> bit or the <platform> bit, but Im happy
> however you think it should work.
Mark excuse me for stupid question.
How I can use this tag in future?

Konstantin.