From: Mark O'D. <mar...@lu...> - 2001-07-30 15:30:38
|
John Bellardo wrote: > On Sunday, July 29, 2001, at 10:27 AM, Mark O'Donohue wrote: > >> >> Hi >> >> > > Are you proposing switching all tests to dejagnu starting with LIMIT, > or using the LIMIT tests to experiment with dejagnu to determine if we > want to move all our tests over? I was thinking of using dejagnu (or more particularly expect) to do the main driving, it has some wonderful terminal driving capabilities, and it has been around quite a while. Actually just looking at http://expect.nist.gov - there are links to two windows ports one cygwin and one native. But it is a supurb tool every bit as good as what i've seen in LoadRunner scripting language. It's not windows based scripting (which is a dog anyway) but then neither is sql. > Either way I'm sure it would work out better than TCS. That I think is a certainty, at at least with cygwin the whole dejagnu thing can be run. expect runs the process and it's up to the expect script to recognise a successful outcome and write "SUCCESS: test104" which is then used in the dejagnu package to workout what passed and failed - pretty simple stuff. As I wrote previously, $autoexpect also works like a macro recorder. Cheers Mark -- Your database needs YOU! http://firebird.sourceforge.net GPL: free software today - and still free tomorrow |