From: Mark O'D. <mar...@lu...> - 2000-11-08 12:36:57
|
Ok So here is a message that really went astray, I sent it on the 23/10/00 but it only went to Tom (Coleman) when it was supposed to go here. I only found out this was missing when I went hunting back for the results. Updates from this are that super now passes SQL_EVENT_13 - I haven't changed anything - I think it just needed a little time. Anyway enjoy - original title was "FirebirdCS passed (SS nearly so)". ;-). Mark Hi All Well, the linux firebird 0.9 classic release passed through the TCS test suite (ib-tests) without any problems. So we haven't buggered things up there too much, as yet ;-). The firebird 0.9 super release passed through just about everything except possibly the test SQL_EVENT_13 and a number of tests where things were marked as read only. I did a ^C to kill test SQL_EVENT_13 as the script was taking some time . I may have killed this test prematurely. since the output log seems to make some sense. So a few tests to have a look at. I've attached the logs for both runs (compressed they are only 2K each), so if anyone knows better than me what they mean, id appreciate it. One amusing thing is that the meta test suite VECTOR_12HOUR only takes about 20 minutes to run. Im not sure if this means that cpu's are a lot faster these days, ... or the number of test cases in it has been reduced quite a bit, or im missing something. Anyway its good to have something to bounce our changes off. So I suppose we need to get a README organised, and figure out if we are aiming for a Firebird 1.0 or 6.01. I can put that one up as a questionare alongside the one about reindenting the source code ;-). Anyway, feedback on the installs or tests results would be welcome. Cheers Mark -- Your database needs YOU! http://sourceforge.net/projects/firebird |