From: Mark O'D. <mar...@lu...> - 2000-11-01 16:49:02
|
Ann Harrison wrote: > At 07:55 AM 10/25/2000 +1100, Mark O'Donohue wrote: > >>> It appears that we have the nightly test stuff which belonged to >>> engineering >>> and generally worked. >> >> >> Thanks for that, so this is kind of a smoke test, So what is in this >> other >> stuff that takes months to run? > > > The suite used by the QA group was full of test and result errors - > bad design and bad initialization. Each of those tests was run once > for each server/client platform pair. Each failure was researched and > documented. So, a test which printed 'today' in date format would be > analyzed a dozen times, and each time reported as an error in test > design - "test does not return a consistent answer." Each analysis > required reading the test, running it manually, reading the expected > result, comparing it with the actual result both of the automated test > and the manual test, and writing a little report. > >> I presume a lot of it is manual, which explains the time required to >> run it, and probably explains Inprises reluctance to run it again. > > > There are some manual tests and some load tests that require special > hardware. You don't want to know my real opinion about all this. I presume these are the tests then that require a good cleanup and rethink anyway. I assume the chances of Inprise doing this are about zero. Do you think Inprise will ever invest time in rerunning this QA test suite again? It's interesting, if this was one of the main cost items, I wonder how they would plan to go in selling it or use of it. It would appear that if it requires a lot of effort to implement then they wouldn't be able to sell it for too much. I suppose if Jim is right and they effectively dump IB as soon as their current contracts wind up, then they'll try and sell it then. How would you rate it, I would guess that the TCS suite gets rid of the obvious bugs, but how much value does running the QA suite add to say running TCS on all client/server platforms, and putting in some volume/stress tests. Cheers Mark |