From: Patrick J. P. G. <Pat...@wo...> - 2000-10-19 11:11:37
|
Frank, Thanks for trying those two combinations. As I thought more and more about the current firebird build I became convinced that it was only a coincidence that it didn't abort. The internal generator ID was being passed to the next routine as if it was a valid pointer - but in this case the pointer field is used to hold that ID. I've sent in a change that prevents this. ...pat My family sits at dinner and the conversation gets thinner. My thoughts are over yonder for on this C code I do ponder. -----Original Message----- From: fir...@li... [mailto:fir...@li...] On Behalf Of Frank Schlottmann-Goedde Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2000 4:14 AM To: fir...@li... Subject: Re: [Firebird-test] Please try this new test "Patrick J. P. Griffin" schrieb: > > Hello! > > I've been contemplating a potential bug in jrd/cmp.c > > If you can, would you please enter the test shown below and see if you get > the correct results. > ...pat Here is the result against an original Inprise IB60SS: Running global test CF_ISQL_17 ... *** failed **** Test CF_ISQL_17 failed on 19-OCT-2000: initialized by frank on 19-OCT-2000 with boilerplate BP_FB ------------------- 59,61 c 59,61 < 4 1228 < 1 3428 < --------------------------------------------- > 4 4 > 1 20 > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 107,110 c 107,111 < < 4 1004 4205 6630 < 1 1007 6216 11840 < --------------------------------------------- > Statement failed, SQLCODE = -902 > > database file appears corrupt () > -wrong page type > -page 0 is of wrong type (expected 9, found 1) ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ------------------- Frank _______________________________________________ Firebird-test mailing list Fir...@li... http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/firebird-test |