firebird-test

[Firebird-test] Should All QMTests Pass?

[Greg K. <gk...@ob...>]

Hi,

We've just installed QMTest running against Firebird 2.1 Classic on 
linux but out of 551 tests, 22 have errors and 24 fail.

We installed

python-2.5.2.msi
pywin32-210.win32-py2.5.exe
kinterbasdb-3.2.win32-FB-1.0-py2.5.exe
qmtest-2.4.win32.exe

Also, is the difference between "ERROR" and "FAIL" that "ERROR" is some 
unexpected exception in the test?

Thanks.

Greg

Re: [Firebird-test] Should All QMTests Pass?

[Philippe M. <mak...@fi...>]

Greg Kay  [08-04-29 09.06] :
> Hi,
> 
> We've just installed QMTest running against Firebird 2.1 Classic on 
> linux but out of 551 tests, 22 have errors and 24 fail.
> 
> We installed
> 
> python-2.5.2.msi
> pywin32-210.win32-py2.5.exe
> kinterbasdb-3.2.win32-FB-1.0-py2.5.exe
> qmtest-2.4.win32.exe
> 
> 
hum
you ran test from Windows platform against a Linux Firebird ?

Our Qmtests are made to be run on the same box that Firebird is installed

 > Also, is the difference between "ERROR" and "FAIL" that "ERROR" is some
 > unexpected exception in the test?
yes