You can subscribe to this list here.
2000 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(13) |
Oct
(12) |
Nov
(26) |
Dec
(2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2001 |
Jan
(8) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(20) |
May
(31) |
Jun
(7) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(56) |
Sep
(2) |
Oct
|
Nov
(3) |
Dec
(1) |
2002 |
Jan
(4) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(2) |
Apr
(4) |
May
(2) |
Jun
(20) |
Jul
(31) |
Aug
(14) |
Sep
(30) |
Oct
(14) |
Nov
(13) |
Dec
(32) |
2003 |
Jan
(29) |
Feb
(46) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(3) |
May
(9) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(7) |
Aug
(6) |
Sep
(5) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(7) |
Dec
(5) |
2004 |
Jan
(6) |
Feb
|
Mar
(5) |
Apr
(2) |
May
(3) |
Jun
|
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(4) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(5) |
Dec
(3) |
2005 |
Jan
|
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(23) |
Apr
(1) |
May
(5) |
Jun
|
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
|
2006 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(2) |
May
(3) |
Jun
|
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(10) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
|
2007 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(2) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2008 |
Jan
|
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(28) |
Apr
(18) |
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(20) |
2009 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(2) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2010 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(2) |
Apr
(2) |
May
|
Jun
(5) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(10) |
Oct
(3) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
(2) |
2011 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(2) |
Apr
(3) |
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(2) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(1) |
2012 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(7) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2013 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
(2) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
(7) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
|
2014 |
Jan
|
Feb
(3) |
Mar
|
Apr
(3) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(2) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2015 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(2) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2016 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
From: Leyne, S. <Se...@br...> - 2004-11-08 17:51:21
|
JS, > Can somebody do this test for me? There seems to be some memory leak in > the > udf 'addDay'(fbudf comes with firebird). If I call the Stored > Procedure given below in a loop, memory usage of firebird (using top > command in linux) crosses 100MB in a few minutes. When I comment the > statement calling 'addDay', there is no memory increase. Please confirm which Firebird version you are using. Sean |
From: Joga S. <jog...@in...> - 2004-10-21 12:52:29
|
Can somebody do this test for me? There seems to be some memory leak in the udf 'addDay'(fbudf comes with firebird). If I call the Stored Procedure given below in a loop, memory usage of firebird (using top command in linux) crosses 100MB in a few minutes. When I comment the statement calling 'addDay', there is no memory increase. JS ------------------------------------- SET TERM !!; CREATE OR ALTER PROCEDURE testget_maxdate RETURNS (retval int) AS declare date_in timestamp; declare ret_in timestamp; begin date_in=current_timestamp; ret_in=addday(date_in,1); -- ret_in=addday(cast(date_in as date),1); -- ret_in=addmillisecond(addday(cast(date_in as date),1),-1); retval=1; SUSPEND; end !! SET TERM ; !! |
From: Leyne, S. <Se...@br...> - 2004-10-15 03:46:06
|
Carlos, > "Pavel Cisar" wrote: >=20 > > Hi, > > > > First, this is not a support forum, use > > fir...@ya... instead in future. > > >=20 > Why not replacing this list name for something which move away the > newbyes? How clearer does the description for the list have to be? The original description was: "Firebird test flight /suite information" I just updated to read: "Firebird engine testing, test flight/suite discussion/information" Sean |
From: Leyne, S. <Se...@br...> - 2004-10-15 03:41:36
|
> Can I use SQL syntax in FireBird like this: >=20 > SELECT DB1.C_NAME,DB2.N_NUMBER FROM "C:\DB1.FDB' DB1,"C:\DB2.FDB' DB2 > WHERE > DB1.N_ID=3DDB2.N_ID First, this is not a support forum, use fir...@ya... instead in future. To your question:=20 No you can't. The engine does not support cross-database queries. Sean |
From: cOOl <coo...@ma...> - 2004-10-14 08:14:01
|
Hello, Can I use SQL syntax in FireBird like this: SELECT DB1.C_NAME,DB2.N_NUMBER FROM "C:\DB1.FDB' DB1,"C:\DB2.FDB' DB2 WHERE DB1.N_ID=DB2.N_ID |
From: Carlos M. <CM...@su...> - 2004-09-14 13:27:12
|
"Pavel Cisar" wrote: > Hi, > > First, this is not a support forum, use > fir...@ya... instead in future. > Why not replacing this list name for something which move away the newbyes? Carlos Macao |
From: Pavel C. <pc...@ib...> - 2004-09-14 09:53:34
|
Hi, On 13 Sep 2004 at 21:48, kelv wrote: > Hi, > I have installed FirebirdSS-1.5.1.4481-0.i686 on a red hat 8. When I > gbak -r a gbk file(backup from v1 firebird running on red hat 7.2). > Following error occur: > Unable to complete network connection to "localhost"... > error in reading data.. > broken pipe. > > I have checked that firebird server is started and "gds_db tcp/3050" was > included in the /etc/services. > > Would u please advice how to I fix this problem. Thank a lot! First, this is not a support forum, use fir...@ya... instead in future. To your question: You apparently doesn't have /etc/host.equiv file with localhost.localdomain entry (sometimes, an + entry is also needed). It's needed for SS local connections to work properly. Best regards Pavel Cisar (ICQ: 89017288) http://www.ibphoenix.com For all your upto date Firebird and InterBase information |
From: kelv <ke...@ya...> - 2004-09-13 13:49:28
|
Hi, I have installed FirebirdSS-1.5.1.4481-0.i686 on a red hat 8. When I gbak -r a gbk file(backup from v1 firebird running on red hat 7.2). Following error occur: Unable to complete network connection to "localhost"... error in reading data.. broken pipe. I have checked that firebird server is started and "gds_db tcp/3050" was included in the /etc/services. Would u please advice how to I fix this problem. Thank a lot! kelv |
From: Zbigniew C. <z.c...@ga...> - 2004-09-10 21:59:18
|
sorry for my english FB 1.5.1 on linux (debian) I write some udf's. they are in "zbylo_udf" file When i try use my UDF function (function is ok. he work fine on FB 1.0.3. and second 1.5.1). I have two error: Invalid token. invalid request BLR at offset 63. function INTTOIP is not defined. module name or entrypoint could not be found. or Access to UDF library "libzbylo_udf.so" is denied by server administrator. we have second server (same like this) and this work very well. |
From: Chau C. Y. <cc...@es...> - 2004-08-18 13:41:09
|
Dear All, I found a problem with Firebird 1.03 972 windows version. I hope someone may help. The problem is the Open and Close connection to Firebird 1.03 server is slow in some situations. I use Delphi to write a simple test case to Open / Close repeatedly: Access database locally: ======================== procedure TForm1.Button1Click(Sender: TObject); var i: integer; d1, d2: integer; begin IBDatabase1.DatabaseName := 'c:\test.fdb'; for i := 1 to 10 do begin IBDatabase1.Open; IBDatabase1.Close; end; end; The above procedures show the results: IB 6 FB 1.03(972) FB 1.5.1 Win98 Fast Fast Fast WinXP Fast Fast Fast Access database using TCP: ========================== procedure TForm1.Button1Click(Sender: TObject); var i: integer; d1, d2: integer; begin IBDatabase1.DatabaseName := 'localhost:c:\test.fdb'; for i := 1 to 10 do begin IBDatabase1.Open; IBDatabase1.Close; end; end; The above procedures show the results: IB 6 FB 1.03(972) FB 1.5.1 Win98 Fast Fast Fast WinXP Fast -> Slow <- Fast I suspect it could be the Firebird 1.03 972 's problem. It shows slow performance over TCP connection in Windows XP. I don't think it is machine's problem or TCP/IP network problem as implicated from the above result. If you use IB Console to repeatedly open/Close database running on Firebird 1.03 972 windows xp, you can feel the some pause as well. Since my application still running on Firebird 1.03, I couldn't upgrade to Firebird 1.5 at the moment. Could anyone please give me some advice? I suspect it is the compilation problem in Firebird 1.03 972 release. -- Best regards, Chau Chee Yang E Stream Software Sdn Bhd URL: www.sql.com.my SQL Financial Accounting |
From: Tang H. <tan...@12...> - 2004-08-11 09:54:00
|
http://test.3asoft.com |
From: Ignacio J. O. <na...@si...> - 2004-08-03 16:03:44
|
Hola a todos: Last weekend i was trying QMDB with 1.5.X Branch, and i have some comments/ questions: 1) i've tried HEAD of the qmdb module, is this correct for testing 1.5.1 branch? 2) Some test fail with problems related to the use of linux only things, so commented them and go ( rel=F1ated to WIFSIGNALED)=20 3) Just now the database used for crating user resources is isc5.gdb, for 1.5.1 is securioty.fdb.. so corrected it and some test more passes.. 4) theres is a bug in the code that closes and deletes the stdout file, it deltes it before closing, changed order of operations another some tests passed.. 5) all the create database tests fail with problms related to versiongn of the infos tested to see if everything works ok, concretely test ask for 146 pages in clena empty database and 1.5.x gibves 142 pages.. = a=F1as test is actually ok.. but the it's done.. fails.. I have this problems solved in my local tree, but it seems to me that should be a branch for fb 1.0.X, testing another for 1.5.X testing leaving HEAD for HEAD testing.. i can commit a doit things but i need to ask here, to not srtep in another one shoes.. Any help will be appreciatted.. Saludos, Ignacio J. Ortega |
From: Jörg A. <_no...@oa...> - 2004-07-21 15:38:31
|
Hello, we are using Firebird-Server (1.5.1.4481). Our programs are written in Delphi 5 and database connection is made with IBObjects\IBX (both with same behavior). There seems to be a bug in Firebird. We need to know the primary key of a TIBOTable-Object and use the value ixPrimary of Property IndexDef.Options. Under any circumstances this information is not delivered by Firebird. When we create the table with primary index at an Interbase-Server (6.0.1.6) and use the database under Firebird everything is ok. When you create the same table under Firebird, the information about the primary key is lost, even if you use the database under Interbase. If anybody knows about this problem, it would be great to help us With best regards Jörg Antoni |
From: Leyne, S. <Se...@br...> - 2004-07-06 14:38:08
|
> I have compiled FB version "SI-V1.5.1.4481 Firebird 1.5". >=20 > What is a "official" test module for releasing binaries? >=20 > qmdb? tsc? fbtcs? All of the above? ;-) Seriously, I'm not aware of any "official"/single test module. In the long run, I expect that qmdb will be that platform, it is much nicer to work with that fbtcs. At the moment, however, there are a number of tests in fbtcs (which is descendant from the IB tcs source) which don't yet have coverage in qmdb. So, the 2 are pretty much required. Sean |
From: Konstantin K. <klk...@ns...> - 2004-07-05 14:35:46
|
Hi All! I have compiled FB version "SI-V1.5.1.4481 Firebird 1.5". What is a "official" test module for releasing binaries? qmdb? tsc? fbtcs? Konstantin Kuznetsov |
From: Webmaster <jxa...@ya...> - 2004-05-21 12:31:19
|
I run a query in the JSP pages or JAVA application and then when i print the output of resultset; my Turkish characters are not shown correctly. How can i set characterset in FireBird ? I tried this line : <%@ page contentType="text/html; charset=CP1254" %> in JSP pages but problem continues. Please help me. Thanks alot. |
From: Pavel C. <pc...@ib...> - 2004-05-20 10:39:28
|
Hi, On 19 May 2004 at 12:37, Dan wrote: > When I connect to a FirebirdSS 1.x server running on Red Hat 7.2 my WinXP > app works well. The same FirebirdSS 1.x server but on Red Hat 9 - when I > start the same application, it throws a fatal exception and dies! > > What's happening? Any hint? I think that this relate to shared libraries issue, very likely to pthreads RH9 library. Try FB 1.5 on RH9, or older libc/libpthread etc. libraries taken from RH 7.2. But I guess that FB 1.5 would be the best way to go. P.S.: Please, use firebird-support list for future support questions. Best regards Pavel Cisar (ICQ: 89017288) http://www.ibphoenix.com For all your upto date Firebird and InterBase information |
From: Dan <off...@ul...> - 2004-05-19 16:24:02
|
When I connect to a FirebirdSS 1.x server running on Red Hat 7.2 my WinXP app works well. The same FirebirdSS 1.x server but on Red Hat 9 - when I start the same application, it throws a fatal exception and dies! What's happening? Any hint? |
From: Maciej M. <rea...@po...> - 2004-04-17 01:09:13
|
hi! my system: gentoo i have problem with firebird-1.5.0 configured ro run as standalone server as user 'firebird' of same group this is my log: " reaver (Client) Sat Apr 17 02:32:15 2004 INET/inet_error: connect errno = 111 reaver (Client) Sat Apr 17 02:32:15 2004 /opt/firebird/bin/fbguard: guardian starting bin/fbserver reaver (Server) Sat Apr 17 02:32:17 2004 SERVER/process_packet: connection rejected for firebird [...] " i'm totally new in databases - i'm only to host this database for some time on my machine for someone else, so any help would be appreciated thanks in advance -- reaver http://reavertm.webpark.pl/ Registered Linux User #305535 GG: 1902752 |
From: Pavel C. <pc...@ib...> - 2004-04-01 08:36:55
|
Hi, On 31 Mar 2004 at 17:04, Tony Andersen wrote: > hi all... > I'm using below code in win2000/xp computers for starting Interbase. > >>>> net start "Interbase Guardian" > but I don't know FireBird's service name and I cannot run.. > what can I do?? First, this is not a support list, for future support questions, use Firebird-support instead. Now to your question: According to the FB 1.5 Release Notes, the new service names on Windows are "Firebird Guardian DefaultInstance" and "Firebird Server DefaultInstance". Best regards Pavel Cisar (ICQ: 89017288) http://www.ibphoenix.com For all your upto date Firebird and InterBase information |
From: Tony A. <ya...@sa...> - 2004-03-31 14:03:22
|
hi all... I'm using below code in win2000/xp computers for starting Interbase. >>>> net start "Interbase Guardian" but I don't know FireBird's service name and I cannot run.. what can I do?? Tony |
From: Aage J. <aag...@on...> - 2004-03-06 21:38:16
|
On Sat, 6 Mar 2004 19:05:07 +0000 (UTC), Rafik wrote: > Here is some updates that crashes the server : > ... > -- This doesn't happen in version 1, only in version 1.5 Try the firebird-support NG. Which version of 1.5 - RC1-RC9 or final? If final, the firebird-devel may be the best NG. -- Aage J. |
From: Aage J. <aag...@on...> - 2004-03-06 21:36:15
|
On Sat, 6 Mar 2004 19:05:07 +0000 (UTC), renniw one wrote: > Hi, > Is there a way to create table with a field set to a default value? For > example... > > CREATE TABLE my_table ( > my_num BIGINT NOT NULL ); > > Is there a way to have the my_num initially hold the value 0? Thanks. This is a question for the firebird-support NG. And, the answer is in the docs: default 0. -- Aage J. |
From: Rafik <rb...@mi...> - 2004-03-05 15:01:31
|
Here is some updates that crashes the server : update contacts_guest cg set cg.frequency = (select count(md.record_no) from master_detail md where md.contact_code = cg.contact_code and md.reservation_type in (9, 16)) ^ update contacts_guest cg set cg.number_nights = (select sum(md.number_nights) from master_detail md where md.contact_code = cg.contact_code and md.reservation_type in (9, 16)) ^ VP_MINGUS (Client) Wed Mar 03 09:48:29 2004 C:\PROGRAM FILES\FIREBIRD\FIREBIRD_1_5\bin\fbserver.exe: terminated abnormally (3221225477) -- This doesn't happen in version 1, only in version 1.5 -- Rafik Berzi |
From: renniw o. <re...@ms...> - 2004-03-02 02:06:10
|
Hi, Is there a way to create table with a field set to a default value? For example... CREATE TABLE my_table ( my_num BIGINT NOT NULL ); Is there a way to have the my_num initially hold the value 0? Thanks. Ren |