From: Mercea P. <pau...@ya...> - 2008-04-20 10:38:45
|
Hi Is there a way to specify for Backup service to use nbackup and make incremental backup? Regards, Paul |
From: Jiri C. <di...@ci...> - 2008-04-20 13:21:33
|
On 4/20/08, Mercea Paul <pau...@ya...> wrote: > Is there a way to specify for Backup service to use nbackup and make > incremental backup? No. AFAIK nbackup isn't available thru Service API. -- Jiri {x2} Cincura (CTO x2develop.com) http://blog.vyvojar.cz/jirka/ | http://www.ID3renamer.com |
From: Mercea P. <pau...@rd...> - 2008-04-20 17:08:38
|
> On 4/20/08, Mercea Paul <pau...@ya...> wrote: > > Is there a way to specify for Backup service to use nbackup and make > > incremental backup? > > No. AFAIK nbackup isn't available thru Service API. Nether I can find any link to api for nbackup..hope you know more! This is a bad news...back to batch file...or process ! Regards, Paul |
From: Roman R. <ro...@ro...> - 2008-04-20 21:48:27
|
>>> Is there a way to specify for Backup service to use nbackup and make >>> incremental backup? >> No. AFAIK nbackup isn't available thru Service API. > > Nether I can find any link to api for nbackup..hope you know more! > This is a bad news...back to batch file...or process ! AFAIK, nbackup can be completely managed via SQL, so you can automate this part in your application. Whether it is Services API or DSQL API - it does not really matter. What matters is whether the driver provides the convenience methods for it. For example, our JDBC driver doesn't - not enough time to implement it, same, I think, applies to .NET provider. But you can help - code it for your application and contribute the code back to the project. As basis for the next development it is more than enough. Roman |
From: Helen B. <he...@tp...> - 2008-04-20 23:30:37
|
At 03:07 AM 21/04/2008, Mercea Paul wrote: >> On 4/20/08, Mercea Paul <pau...@ya...> wrote: >> > Is there a way to specify for Backup service to use nbackup and make >> > incremental backup? >> >> No. AFAIK nbackup isn't available thru Service API. > >Nether I can find any link to api for nbackup..hope you know more! There isn't an API. nBak and nBackup are plug-in applications and as such they are clients that *use* the API, much as any other application does. The Services API isn't a nice, clean, extensible interface like the engine API, unfortunately. It is a cocktail of functions passing parameters to a mishmash of embedded code, macros and who-knows-what. I mean, literally, the code for gbak, gfix, gsec and so on is duplicated in the engine! Bloating the engine with more optional code is not part of the Firebird design strategy - so forget about an API for nbackup or other plug-ins ever being available through the Services API as currently implemented! The good news is that a new API encompassing both pluggable and internal code is on the drawing board, if not for Fb 3.0 then for a v.3.x. This is going to open the doors for a correct and future-safe way to do things: not just incremental backup but pluggable security, replication, search engines, external procedures and whatever anyone wants to dream about right now... Helen |
From: Mercea P. <pau...@rd...> - 2008-04-21 05:45:01
|
Thanks Helen and Roman! > -----Original Message----- > From: fir...@li... > [mailto:fir...@li...] On Behalf > Of Helen Borrie > Sent: 21 April 2008 02:32 > To: 'For users and developers of the Firebird .NET providers' > Subject: Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Service API and nbackup > > At 03:07 AM 21/04/2008, Mercea Paul wrote: > >> On 4/20/08, Mercea Paul <pau...@ya...> wrote: > >> > Is there a way to specify for Backup service to use nbackup and > make > >> > incremental backup? > >> > >> No. AFAIK nbackup isn't available thru Service API. > > > >Nether I can find any link to api for nbackup..hope you know more! > > There isn't an API. nBak and nBackup are plug-in applications and as > such they are clients that *use* the API, much as any other application > does. > > The Services API isn't a nice, clean, extensible interface like the > engine API, unfortunately. It is a cocktail of functions passing > parameters to a mishmash of embedded code, macros and who-knows-what. > I mean, literally, the code for gbak, gfix, gsec and so on is > duplicated in the engine! Bloating the engine with more optional code > is not part of the Firebird design strategy - so forget about an API > for nbackup or other plug-ins ever being available through the Services > API as currently implemented! > > The good news is that a new API encompassing both pluggable and > internal code is on the drawing board, if not for Fb 3.0 then for a > v.3.x. This is going to open the doors for a correct and future-safe > way to do things: not just incremental backup but pluggable security, > replication, search engines, external procedures and whatever anyone > wants to dream about right now... > > Helen > > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- > This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference > Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. > Use priority code J8TL2D2. > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/ > javaone > _______________________________________________ > Firebird-net-provider mailing list > Fir...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-net-provider |