From: David B <NO_...@ya...> - 2004-03-31 01:56:53
|
Hi I have just upgraded to the latest version of the 1.5 provider for .dot I have found that different versions take different connection string. two examples are below, note the server and datasource property have changed between the two. when did this change happen, and are we lightly to see any other changes in connection string. <add key="DbConnectionString" value="Database=E:\\TEST.FDB;User=SYSDB!;Password=masterkey;Dialect=3;Server =localhost;Pooling=false;DataSource=c3po"/> <!--This connection string does not work--> <add key="DbConnectionString" value="Database=E:\\TEST.FDB;User=SYSDB-;Password=masterkey;Dialect=3;Server =c3po;Pooling=false;"/> incidentally do I need to put the port number in, and is this always 3050, say I wanted to change the port, how exactly do I do it. cheers martin. |
From:
<car...@te...> - 2006-04-10 21:13:41
|
Hello: I'm thinking if i should do or not ( if not it will be done post v2.0=20 release ) a minor change in connection strings, just add a new 'Catalog' synonym for Database connection string parameter. Opinions welcome !!! --=20 Carlos Guzm=E1n =C1lvarez Vigo-Spain http://carlosga.blogspot.com/ "When you don't code, you tend to become one of those architects who thin= ks everything is possible" ( Anders Hejlsberg ) |
From: Jiri C. <di...@ci...> - 2006-04-10 21:19:54
|
On 10.4.2006 23:13 Carlos Guzm=E1n =C1lvarez wrote: > Hello: >=20 >=20 > I'm thinking if i should do or not ( if not it will be done post v2.0=20 > release ) a minor change in connection strings, just > add a new 'Catalog' synonym for Database connection string parameter. >=20 > Opinions welcome !!! >=20 >=20 >=20 I think, if it will be synonym, why not. For me, this is not important. I'll use the "good old" syntax. ;) --=20 Jiri Cincura http://www.cincura.net/ |
From:
<car...@te...> - 2006-04-10 21:29:15
|
Hello: > I think, if it will be synonym, why not. > > For me, this is not important. I'll use the "good old" syntax. ;) Yes, it's more a matter of compatibility with other provider when using=20 the Connection String Builders in a generic way using=20 DbConnectionStringBuilder. --=20 Carlos Guzm=E1n =C1lvarez Vigo-Spain http://carlosga.blogspot.com/ "When you don't code, you tend to become one of those architects who thin= ks everything is possible" ( Anders Hejlsberg ) |
From: Jiri C. <di...@ci...> - 2006-04-10 21:34:14
|
On 10.4.2006 23:29 Carlos Guzm=E1n =C1lvarez wrote: > Hello: >> I think, if it will be synonym, why not. >> >> For me, this is not important. I'll use the "good old" syntax. ;) >=20 > Yes, it's more a matter of compatibility with other provider when using= =20 > the Connection String Builders in a generic way using=20 > DbConnectionStringBuilder. >=20 OK. I think this wouldn't be a problem. --=20 Jiri Cincura http://www.cincura.net/ |
From:
<car...@te...> - 2006-04-10 21:43:58
|
Hello: > OK. I think this wouldn't be a problem. Of course it's not a great deal, but i think it can be useful. --=20 Carlos Guzm=E1n =C1lvarez Vigo-Spain http://carlosga.blogspot.com/ "When you don't code, you tend to become one of those architects who thin= ks everything is possible" ( Anders Hejlsberg ) |
From: Paul M. <pau...@al...> - 2006-04-11 05:15:54
|
It will be ok... Looks like SQL conection...more readable! PaulM -----Original Message----- From: fir...@li... [mailto:fir...@li...] On Behalf Of Carlos Guzm=E1n =C1lvarez Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 12:14 AM To: fir...@li... Subject: [Firebird-net-provider] Connection string change Hello: I'm thinking if i should do or not ( if not it will be done post v2.0=20 release ) a minor change in connection strings, just add a new 'Catalog' synonym for Database connection string parameter. Opinions welcome !!! --=20 Carlos Guzm=E1n =C1lvarez Vigo-Spain http://carlosga.blogspot.com/ "When you don't code, you tend to become one of those architects who = thinks everything is possible" ( Anders Hejlsberg ) ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting = language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live = webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding = territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd______________________________________= ___ ______ Firebird-net-provider mailing list Fir...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-net-provider |
From:
<car...@te...> - 2004-03-31 10:56:31
|
Hello: > incidentally do I need to put the port number in, and is this always 3050, > say I wanted to change the port, how exactly do I do it. Add a Port=portnumber to te connection string -- Best regards Carlos Guzmán Álvarez Vigo-Spain |
From: David B <NO_...@ya...> - 2004-04-01 20:34:34
|
Thanks for the reply, sorry maybe I wan't clear > > incidentally do I need to put the port number in, and is this always 3050, > > say I wanted to change the port, how exactly do I do it. > > Add a Port=portnumber to te connection string what I mean't was how do I change what port firebird runs on, or is this always set at the default of 3050. cheers "Carlos Guzmán Álvarez" <car...@te...> wrote in message news:406...@te...... > Hello: > > > > > > -- > Best regards > > Carlos Guzmán Álvarez > Vigo-Spain > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials > Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of > GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system > administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Firebird-net-provider mailing list > Fir...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-net-provider > |
From:
<car...@te...> - 2004-04-01 21:51:10
|
Hello: > what I mean't was how do I change what port firebird runs on, or is this > always set at the default of 3050. Review the firebird configuration file (RemoteServicePort) -- Best regards Carlos Guzmán Álvarez Vigo-Spain |