From:
<car...@te...> - 2004-03-01 12:50:37
|
Hello: I'm thinking on remove FbDbType.LongVarBinary element in 1.6 sources, i think it's not really needed as we have already a FbDbType.Binary element that has the same meaning and i think that it's more correct for binary blobs. But i want to know first people opinions :) -- Best regards Carlos Guzmán Álvarez Vigo-Spain P.S.: I have plans for release the 1.6 Alpha 1 this week after have finished some changes in the Array data type support. |
From: Da J. <da...@ho...> - 2004-03-01 17:25:53
|
Dear Carlos, My humble two cents: From point view of an ex-SQL Server programmer, I would think FbDbType.LongVarBinary represents Firebird binary blobs better than FbDbType.Binary. If they represents the same binary blobs, LongVarBinary will tell people like me what it really is. Thank you for bring us this wonderful product. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Carlos Guzmán Álvarez" <car...@te...> To: "firebird-net-provider" <fir...@li...> Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 4:46 AM Subject: [Firebird-net-provider] FbDbType.LongVarBinary removal question > Hello: > > I'm thinking on remove FbDbType.LongVarBinary element in 1.6 sources, i > think it's not really needed as we have already a FbDbType.Binary > element that has the same meaning and i think that it's more correct for > binary blobs. > > But i want to know first people opinions :) > > > > > -- > Best regards > > Carlos Guzmán Álvarez > Vigo-Spain > > > P.S.: I have plans for release the 1.6 Alpha 1 this week after have > finished some changes in the Array data type support. > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. > Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with > a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Firebird-net-provider mailing list > Fir...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-net-provider > |
From:
<car...@te...> - 2004-03-02 13:04:01
|
Hello: > My humble two cents: From point view of an ex-SQL Server programmer, I would > think FbDbType.LongVarBinary represents Firebird binary blobs better than > FbDbType.Binary. If they represents the same binary blobs, LongVarBinary > will tell people like me what it really is. Thanks. > Thank you for bring us this wonderful product. Thanks to you for use it :) -- Best regards Carlos Guzmán Álvarez Vigo-Spain |
From: A P. <ap...@ho...> - 2004-03-02 01:49:31
|
FbDbType.LongVarBinary does not tell anything except it is a binary form. To get the actual size of a binary, programmer still need to access the Size so FbDbType.Binary should be fine. Chao, A Pham "Carlos Guzmán Álvarez" <car...@te...> wrote in message news:404...@te...... > Hello: > > I'm thinking on remove FbDbType.LongVarBinary element in 1.6 sources, i > think it's not really needed as we have already a FbDbType.Binary > element that has the same meaning and i think that it's more correct for > binary blobs. > > But i want to know first people opinions :) > > > > > -- > Best regards > > Carlos Guzmán Álvarez > Vigo-Spain > > > P.S.: I have plans for release the 1.6 Alpha 1 this week after have > finished some changes in the Array data type support. > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. > Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with > a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Firebird-net-provider mailing list > Fir...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-net-provider > |
From:
<car...@te...> - 2004-03-02 13:03:56
|
Hello: > FbDbType.LongVarBinary does not tell anything except it is a binary form. To > get > the actual size of a binary, programmer still need to access the Size so > FbDbType.Binary > should be fine. Thanks -- Best regards Carlos Guzmán Álvarez Vigo-Spain |