firebird-net-provider

[Firebird-net-provider] Encoding by field implementation question

[<car...@te...>]

Hello:

I'm thinking on implement encoding handling by field, i have read in a message of 

Nickolay Samofatov in the Jaybird list that for char and varchar fields, character set 
and collation information is sent in the sqlsubtype, but first i want to know opinions :)

I think this is interesting, because it would allow to match Firebird, that allow different 
charsets for each field, what do you think ??.


-- 

Best regards

Carlos Guzmán Álvarez
Vigo-Spain


"Todos somos muy ignorantes. Lo que ocurre es que no todos ignoramos las mismas cosas."

Albert Einstein.

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Encoding by field implementation question

[Martin R. <ne...@mi...>]

Hi Carlos,
yes, I think it is a good Idea.

> I'm thinking on implement encoding handling by field, i have read in a
message of
>
> Nickolay Samofatov in the Jaybird list that for char and varchar fields,
character set
> and collation information is sent in the sqlsubtype, but first i want to
know opinions :)
>
> I think this is interesting, because it would allow to match Firebird,
that allow different
> charsets for each field, what do you think ??.

Best regards
Martin Radvansky

RE: [Firebird-net-provider] Encoding by field implementation question

[Luciano P. <pas...@on...>]

Yes, a good idea for sure. 

-----Original Message-----
From: fir...@li...
[mailto:fir...@li...] On Behalf Of
Martin Radvansky
Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 6:15 PM
To: fir...@li...
Subject: Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Encoding by field implementation
question

Hi Carlos,
yes, I think it is a good Idea.

> I'm thinking on implement encoding handling by field, i have read in a
message of
>
> Nickolay Samofatov in the Jaybird list that for char and varchar 
> fields,
character set
> and collation information is sent in the sqlsubtype, but first i want 
> to
know opinions :)
>
> I think this is interesting, because it would allow to match Firebird,
that allow different
> charsets for each field, what do you think ??.

Best regards
Martin Radvansky




-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Firebird-net-provider mailing list
Fir...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-net-provider

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Encoding by field implementation question

[<car...@te...>]

Hello:

> I'm thinking on implement encoding handling by field, i have read in a 
> message of
>
> Nickolay Samofatov in the Jaybird list that for char and varchar 
> fields, character set and collation information is sent in the 
> sqlsubtype, but first i want to know opinions :)
>
>
> I think this is interesting, because it would allow to match Firebird, 
> that allow different charsets for each field, what do you think ??.
>

The change is added to the CVS, i have tagged the prior sources as 
'NP_1_5_Pre_Beta_2',
i will try to do some tests later today (the nunit test suites is 
executed ok)


-- 
Best regards

Carlos Guzmán Álvarez
Vigo-Spain

"Todos somos muy ignorantes. Lo que ocurre es que no todos ignoramos las 
mismas cosas."
Albert Einstein.