you can also add helper method "Add(FbScript scrip)" to support current ctor.
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 7:57 AM, Jiří Činčura <ji...@ci...> wrote:
> Thinking more about it. Maybe the ctor should be only with optional FbConnection and the rest can be done via SqlStatements property. Then it's not tied to FbScript at all.
>
> Maybe then the FbStatementCollection can have a simple "helper" method "Add(FbStatementCollection)" (or something like that). Then it would look like:
>
> var batchExecution = new FbBatchExceution();
> batchExecution.Statements.Add(script.Results); //maybe rename Results > Statements???
> batchExecution.Execute();
>
> Looks good to me.
>
> --
> Mgr. Jiří Činčura
> Independent IT Specialist
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jiří Činčura
>> Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2015 3:36 PM
>> To: fir...@li...
>> Subject: FbBatchExecution
>>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> Looking at FbBatchExecution's ctor I don't see a reason why it takes
>> FbScript. It should rather be FbStatementCollection I think. The
>> FbBatchExecution is doing nothing with the FbScript. It just needs
>> commands.
>>
>> What do you think? I would add another overload to ctor and make the one
>> with FbScript obsolete.
>>
>> --
>> Mgr. Jiří Činčura
>> Independent IT Specialist
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Firebird-net-provider mailing list
> Fir...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-net-provider
|
